- [John] [tends to end].
- [Is] [John] [planning to prevent]?
The new structural settings advised by the Numbers step 3-5 require no the fresh new hardware for the grammar, as the extraposed constituent are only able to come true because the a fit of the “seems” (Profile step 3), off “be” (Shape cuatro), or of one’s adjective “likely” (Shape 5), and certainly will getting arranged as the a sis of lexical head of your own related AP otherwise Vice-president in the manner you to one non-subject disagreement are continuously instantiated.
Will i say, such as for instance, this-Extraposition is going to be stated just like the possible having “likely”, which when you look at the Shape 5 “one she will abide by me” is actually a complement from “likely” and “it” try coinstantiated from the subject away from “be” and you can secondarily by topic out of “seems”? Or shall i claim that the latest “that”-term are coinstantiated by the (“increased so you can”) a quarrel from “be”, and this the fresh valence enabling both “it” and you will a keen extraposed constituent can be found toward verb “be” (Shape 4), and also the “it” try coinstantiated by topic out of “seems”? Otherwise shall we declare that this new “that”-term try coinstantiated by the topic of “be” and you will secondarily of the topic off “seems” and that it was at the degree of the expression went by the “seems” your extraposed condition looks (Contour 5)?
The difference between the brand new possibilities from Numbers step 3-5 has to do with issue from exactly what conflict in the fresh valence of a fit predicator is coinstantiated as to what conflict from the valence of your own governing predicator
It is sometimes complicated to find decisive arguments to respond to this problem, but the option is the structure included in Contour 3. The result is a damage anywhere between a few intuitions. The very first is the “it” as well as the extraposed term shouldn’t be towards vastly various other levels of one’s tree, since they’re inside Profile thirteen, since the, even if undoubtedly maybe not coreferrential, they do in a few experience cash-out an individual semantic demands. The next intuition is that They-extraposition must be developed because the a beneficial valence (linking) construction to help you just take the latest generalization you to regardless of grammatical form (subj, obj, pobj) that discovers null “it” throughout the relevant structural status (child regarding S, daughter off Vice-president, girl of PP) together with semantics-impact term after the latest sentence. All of our sacrifice have been around in perception so that brand new clausal dispute experience coinstantiation up to the best verb into the a cycle regarding increasing predicates after which help “it” and also the semantics-results condition one another become valence areas of so it predicator and possess know correctly. (A separate process will be required if the “seem”-method of predicators exist downstairs, because these verbs do not ensure it is clausal objections inside their limited valences to begin having.)
That it instinct are supported by the point that the korean cupid usual intonation is not suggestive of your extraposed condition are tucked within limit depth in the Vp
It’s ideal to begin with our factor into the unique, “seem”-method of verbs. The latest verb “seem” into the Figures step 3-5 is employed within its IC (hence, Raising) version. In the example of the fresh FC particular new “seem” verbs, however, it’s important to offer the They-Extraposition valence right from the start, i.e., as a part of its restricted valence, once the “that”clause victims so you’re able to “seem” are not you are able to. One valence includes (i) a [role [gf subj, q null]] disagreement that the brand new lexeme “it” is tasked, and you will (ii) a good “that”-clause and therefore carries a special grammatical mode that people will-call “xp” (a mnemonic getting “extraposition”). The new component that have [role [gf xp, q stuff]], being among the many low-subject arguments of your own verb, could be instantiated due to the fact a sis on verb “seem”. Nevertheless the “it”, as being the subject, was without a doubt readily available for coinstantiation from the high embedding predicates, and will hence participate in a sequence from raising.