Seriously, what exactly is incorrect by having a city that is local, that is solitary and freely gay, trying to find intercourse in the off hours? Do single right folks have intercourse? I do believe they are doing. Do they often get it with individuals they’ve just came across, at pubs or events? Why, yes they are doing. Therefore is the fact that brand brand new standard – 
that you’re interested in sleeping with someone else, it’s news if you even vaguely intimate! Because right dudes, once they head to pubs, they never go searching getting set. Oh no. It’s only for an agreeable drink that is platonic buddies. No intercourse, straight please, we’re.
You can find a things that are few on in this tale. First, homophobia. exactly How salacious that a man that is gay wanting to get set (oh my!). 2nd, Internet-phobia. How salacious that somebody used the net to attempt to fulfill another person. Kate McGinty couldn’t have cared less had an unmarried heterosexual town councilman had been making use of eHarmony to fulfill ladies (and then he suggested in the profile he really may indeed give consideration to resting with those females!)…
It is abominable that it was thought by this newspaper highly relevant to come up with this.
– John Aravosis using the Desert Sun to task for writing a non-story about Desert Hot Springs city council user Karl Baker making use of an image of himself in council on their Adam4Adam account. Must’ve been a reeeeeeaaaalllly sluggish news time.
Get Queerty Daily
11 Responses
Minimal Kiwi
It is a much more example that is extreme of Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.
Exactly why is this a problem? How come individuals care? What’s UP with Us citizens having priorities within the incorrect spot?
have a look online – you’ll find a lot of photographs of elected officials glorifying the usage of weapons. this even though 30,000 Americans are killed EACH SEASON by weapon physical violence.
where’s the uproar over that? individuals are too busy being annoyed in regards to the intercourse other folks are experiencing.
your brain boggles.
No. 1 · minimal Kiwi had written, “This is a much more example that is extreme of Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.”
Oh, it is even worse than that. Glance at the image of him – if it’s the main one he utilized, he demonstrably was not trying to find sex at Adam4Adam.com but ended up being instead to locate individuals enthusiastic about a slumber celebration where they actually sleep!
The image plainly shows him dozing off (hardly a shock for it. as he had been probably paying attention with a constituent drone on about representing the Veterans of Foreign ladies, which as 30 regular members, 15 associate users, 23 honorary people, and 3 interns that do the actual work but don’t receives a commission)
Tommy
Exactly just How stupid of him to own their face pic open.He should experienced it locked.He can be really nasty looking we bet he didn’t get numerous times.He should really be fired we don’t want my town councilman on adam 4 adam.
@Tommy: No, I’m sure you would prefer to them be involved in surreptitious nepotism or cronyism…get a life.
Pocket Otter
Judging from that image, I’m sort of guessing Mr. Baker doesn’t get a great deal of reactions in their inbox. Or their outbox. Or mailbox, toolbox, cereal box—let’s face it, the guy might have already been a target of yellowish journalism, but purdy he ain’t.
James
This can be an problem he used) because he used his city council picture (read the article to see the picture. If he’d your own photo and also this article ended up being nevertheless printed, i might discover that more problematic.
And btw, what’s aided by the superficial commentary? Their appearance has nothing at all to do with the presssing problem in front of you.
ousslander
We don’t believe it is homophobic. He place his life that is personal out display, so he can’t be angry that some body published about any of it.
Thomas Maguire
Because when did A wilford that is bewigged brimley down as being a homo?
JoeyB
He’s gross, like the majority of dudes on Adam4Adam.
Jon Tom
It’s nothing but an ole witch hunt that is fashioned! Whom cares just what he seems like!
Manny Espinola
“This is a problem because he utilized their town council picture.”
Actually? Meaning the photo is federal federal government home? As with taken with government digital camera and/or uploaded for federal federal federal government workplace computer?