As previously mentioned above, the assumption that is key the difference-in-differences framework on which we relied is the fact that California’s expansion counties and all sorts of of this nonexpansion counties might have shown similar styles within the lack of the expansion. That presumption is violated, as an example, if Ca had experienced a job-market that is uniquely robust throughout the research duration. Having said that, our company is alert to no evidence that the job-market data recovery in Ca ended up being distinctive from the recovery in other states in a manner that would impact borrowing that is payday. But, more important, Appendix Exhibit A8 shows the time styles in numbers of loans both before and following the expansion. 16 Reassuringly, the display shows that there have been no observable differences when considering future expanding and nonexpanding counties in preexisting time styles, which validates the parallel-trends assumption that underlies our difference-in-differences approach. Continue reading “We therefore discovered no proof that the parallel trends assumption had been violated”
A CineKat_Filmworks project