Relationships certainly lexical and phonological properties
Next we examined relationships among the lexical and phonological properties of the signs in ASL-LEX to gain insight into how phonological, lexical, and semantic factors interact in the ASL lexicon. s = –0.14, p < 0.001. Although it is possible that this inverse correlation is driven by the relatively higher frequency of closed-class words which may be lower in iconicity than other signs, the negative correlation remains when closed-class words (i.e., words with a “minor” Lexical Class) are excluded (r s = –0.17, p < 0.001). This result is compatible with the early proposal that with frequent use, signs may move away from their iconic origins, perhaps due to linguistic pressures to become more integrated into the phonological system (Frishberg, 1975). Interestingly, the direction of this relationship was the opposite of that found for British Sign Language; that is, Vinson et al. (2008) reported a weak positive correlation between frequency and iconicity: r = .146, p < .05. Alternatively, the different correlations might be due differences in stimuli selection. Vinson et al. (2008) intentionally selected stimuli that had a range of iconicity values which resulted in a bimodal iconicity distribution while we did not select signs for inclusion in ASL-LEX based on their iconicity.
Regularity and you will iconicity z-score (SignFrequency(Z) and Black Sites online dating you may Iconicity(Z)) had been significantly adversely synchronised together (select Desk step 1), with an increase of constant cues ranked as reduced iconic; although not, this relationship is poor, roentgen
A number of phonological features was very correlated and in many cases simply because how they was laid out (select Table 1). Continue reading “Such additional show was on account of get across-linguistic differences in the newest attributes of your own BSL and you will ASL lexicons”