JENNIFER MNOOKIN: What matters right here actually, was the fingerprints extremely not the same as you to definitely man more than indeed there

JENNIFER MNOOKIN: What matters right here actually, was the fingerprints extremely not the same as you to definitely man more than indeed there

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Jennifer Mnookin, a law professor on UCLA, try heading a study funded because of the Justice Institution on the fingerprint personality.

Prof. The real question is, is a few section of your fingerprint good enough just like specific region out of their one a simple yet iamnaughty MOBIELE SITE effective checker you are going to mistake particular element of your own print having a part of another person’s printing? Better, which is what took place having Brandon Mayfield.

ITIEL DROR, Ph.D., Cognitive Neuroscientist: This new checker is the instrument off studies. There’s absolutely no purpose criteria. It’s a subjective judgment of your fingerprint checker.

LOWELL BERGMAN: Dr. Itiel Dror, an intellectual neuroscientist based in London, is one of the world’s leading authorities with the fingerprint study. He says that examiners should be influenced by prejudice.

LOWELL BERGMAN: [voice-over] Dr. Dror says it is cognitive prejudice. Along with a study to exhibit just how strong you to definitely bias normally feel, he got actual circumstances – in which examiners had discover a complement – changed new descriptions of the crime, after which asked a comparable examiners to analyze her or him once more. Continue reading “JENNIFER MNOOKIN: What matters right here actually, was the fingerprints extremely not the same as you to definitely man more than indeed there”