- [John] [tends to end].
- [Is] [John] [planning to prevent]?
The new structural settings advised by the Numbers step 3-5 require no the fresh new hardware for the grammar, as the extraposed constituent are only able to come true because the a fit of the “seems” (Profile step 3), off “be” (Shape cuatro), or of one’s adjective “likely” (Shape 5), and certainly will getting arranged as the a sis of lexical head of your own related AP otherwise Vice-president in the manner you to one non-subject disagreement are continuously instantiated.
Will i say, such as for instance, this-Extraposition is going to be stated just like the possible having “likely”, which when you look at the Shape 5 “one she will abide by me” is actually a complement from “likely” and “it” try coinstantiated from the subject away from “be” and you can secondarily by topic out of “seems”? Or shall i claim that the latest “that”-term are coinstantiated by the (“increased so you can”) a quarrel from “be”, and this the fresh valence enabling both “it” and you will a keen extraposed constituent can be found toward verb “be” (Shape 4), and also the “it” try coinstantiated by topic out of “seems”? Otherwise shall we declare that this new “that”-term try coinstantiated by the topic of “be” and you will secondarily of the topic off “seems” and that it was at the degree of the expression went by the “seems” your extraposed condition looks (Contour 5)? Continue reading “But how will we ong this type of about three options?”