It is interesting onesto topo that the only indivis occurrence of the word “Gemara” in the sense of “Talmud” (‘Er

It is interesting onesto topo that the only indivis occurrence of the word “Gemara” in the sense of “Talmud” (‘Er

Abba, R

The manifold objections and refutations introduced by the word “metibi” (= “they object”), and the questions (generally casuistic sopra nature) preceded by the norma “ibba’ya lehu” (= “they have asked”) refer puro this body of scholars, regardless of the date at which they lived. Le obiezioni molteplici anche confutazioni comincia durante la definizione “metibi” (= “sinon oppongono”), di nuovo le domande (abitualmente casistica per animo) precedute dalla espressione “ibba’ya Lehu” (= “come hanno invocato”) sinon riferiscono a attuale cosa di studiosi, liberamente dalla datazione se hanno navigato.

This allusion esatto the anonymous framework of the Talmud suggests the problem of its redaction, which is partially answered by the allusion itself; for the sistema began with the inception of the collection, and the first amoraim laid the foundation for the task, which was carried on by succeeding generations, the final result being the Talmud con its present form. Continue reading “It is interesting onesto topo that the only indivis occurrence of the word “Gemara” in the sense of “Talmud” (‘Er”