Alternatively, the Court notes that a breach of this implied covenant is “merely a breach of the underlying contract,” not a separate cause of action. Caesars Entm’t Corp., No. 14-CV-7091 (SAS), 2015 WL 221055, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. )(citations and quotation marks omitted). “‘[I]f the allegations do not go beyond the statement of a mere contract breach and, relying on the same alleged acts, simply seek the same damages or other relief already claimed in a companion contract cause of action, they may be disregarded as superfluous as no additional claim is actually stated.'” Id.
This new Plaintiff and alleges that Defendant’s imposition regarding “overdraft and you will returned items fees generated exclusively as a result of the remembering of illegal and you will unenforceable purchases towards the Unlawful Payday loan” is “unconscionable rules and you can means
In cases like this, the brand new Plaintiff alleges the Defendant broken its contractual duty to https://paydayloansexpert.com/payday-loans-ne/ help you operate during the good faith from the harming its contractual discernment in order to process deals and fees overdraft charge. Continue reading “MeehanCombs Around the world Borrowing Options Fund, LP v”